The Metaphysics of Logical Consequence

This book PDF is perfect for those who love Philosophy genre, written by Alexandra Zinke and published by Verlag Vittorio Klostermann which was released on 02 June 2024 with total hardcover pages 186. You could read this book directly on your devices with pdf, epub and kindle format, check detail and related The Metaphysics of Logical Consequence books below.

The Metaphysics of Logical Consequence
Author : Alexandra Zinke
File Size : 43,6 Mb
Publisher : Verlag Vittorio Klostermann
Language : English
Release Date : 02 June 2024
ISBN : 3465043456
Pages : 186 pages
Get Book

The Metaphysics of Logical Consequence by Alexandra Zinke Book PDF Summary

The book discusses the central notion of logic: the concept of logical consequence. It shows that the classical definition of consequence as truth preservation in all models must be restricted to all admissible models. The challenge for the philosophy of logic is therefore to supplement the definition with a criterion for admissible models. The problem of logical constants, so prominent in the current debate, constitutes but a special case of this much more general demarcation problem. The book explores the various dimensions of the problem of admissible models and argues that standard responses are unwarranted. As a result, it develops a new vision of logic, suggesting in particular that logic is deeply imbued with metaphysics.

The Metaphysics of Logical Consequence

The book discusses the central notion of logic: the concept of logical consequence. It shows that the classical definition of consequence as truth preservation in all models must be restricted to all admissible models. The challenge for the philosophy of logic is therefore to supplement the definition with a criterion

Get Book
Logical Consequence

To understand logic is, first and foremost, to understand logical consequence. This Element provides an in-depth, accessible, up-to-date account of and philosophical insight into the semantic, model-theoretic conception of logical consequence, its Tarskian roots, and its ideas, grounding, and challenges. The topics discussed include: (i) the passage from Tarski's definition

Get Book
The Concept of Logical Consequence

The Concept of Logical Consequence is a critical evaluation of the model-theoretic and proof-theoretic characterizations of logical consequence that proceeds from Alfred Tarski's characterization of the informal concept of logical consequence. This study evaluates and expands upon ideas set forth in Tarski's 1936 article on logical consequence, and appeals to his 1935

Get Book
Foundations of Logical Consequence

This volume presents new work on a central issue in the philosophy of logic. Leading figures in the field offer ground-breaking insights into topics including the nature of logical consequence; the relation between logic and inference; the relativity of logic; and the structural properties of the consequence relation.

Get Book
The Concept of Logical Consequence

Of course we all know now that mathematics has proved that logic doesn't really make sense, but Etchemendy (philosophy, Stanford Univ.) goes further and challenges the received view of the conceptual underpinnings of modern logic by arguing that Tarski's model-theoretic analysis of logical consequences is wrong. He may have found

Get Book
The Metaphysics of Logic

This wide-ranging collection of essays explores the nature of logic and the key issues and debates in the metaphysics of logic.

Get Book
Logical Pluralism

Consequence is at the heart of logic, and an account of consequence offers a vital tool in the evaluation of arguments. This text presents what the authors term as 'logical pluralism' arguing that the notion of logical consequence doesn't pin down one deductive consequence relation; it allows for many of

Get Book
Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence

Logical pluralism is the view that there is more than one correct logic. This is not necessarily a controversial claim but in its most exciting formulations, pluralism extends to logics that have typically been considered rival accounts of logical consequence – to logics, that is, which adopt seemingly contradictory views about

Get Book